And me from Sweden
Thanks to a recent Windows 10 build leak, it's now been confirmed that Microsoft is experimenting with a new Start menu design which drops live tiles in favour of a more traditional static grid of icons. When Microsoft first introduced live tiles with Windows Phone 7 in 2010, the industry was a very different place. The idea of a "notification center" on smartphones was only just coming around, and live tiles were a different take on that idea. Android and iOS had swipe down notifications, and Windows Phone had live tiles.
But it wasn't until 2012 where Microsoft shoved live tiles into the spotlight, with the launch of Windows 8 on PCs. This version of Windows is infamous for being rejected by the masses because of the massive shift in UI that placed live tiles front and center in a touch-orientated UI. When complaining about Windows 8, it's the "colorful squared touch interface" that people pointed to first. Naturally, Microsoft's insistence on forcing this experience onto users left a bad taste in a lot of people's mouths.
Microsoft eventually backtracked on this by finding a compromise between the old Start menu and the new live tile interface for Windows 10. But doing this meant live tiles were no longer "required" for people to use their PC.
Microsoft eventually backtracked on this by finding a compromise between the old Start menu and the new live tile interface for Windows 10. But doing this meant live tiles were no longer "required" for people to use their PC. A couple of years ago, a source shared with me a document that detailed usage stats of several taskbar buttons, including the Start menu. While I can't share specific numbers, the number of people who were taking the time to customize their live tile layout was not huge.
This restriction means the live tile feature was exclusive to modern apps for five whole years. Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and the first few Windows 10 releases were limited to modern apps supporting live tiles only. That meant that even if people wanted to use live tiles, they probably couldn't because the apps they use didn't support them. These days, things are better, but most Win32 programs still don't have excellent live tile support.
And that, ultimately, is the other big reason as to why I think Microsoft is pivoting away from live tiles. As the industry slowly moves over to building Progressive Web Apps that work across all platforms, there's even fewer chances developers are going to want to build out live tile support for their apps. Making PWAs fit into the Windows experience seamlessly should be Microsoft's number one priority and asking them to build a live tile is extra work many developers won't do.
Every app, whether it's a Progressive Web App (PWA), Universal app (UWP), or Win32 program, has an icon. Only a small percentage of those also have a live tile. So why build an entire user experience around something that a minority of apps support? It makes more sense to develop your user experience around the thing everyone has and make that experience the best it can be. It's also simpler, cleaner, and more straightforward for users to deal with icons instead of live tiles.
Perhaps we could see live tiles evolve as "widgets" you can pin to your desktop. But I don't think we'll see them around for much longer as an integral part of Windows. I don't believe this pivot away from live tiles is a bad thing, either. Sure, it's sad, but once Windows 10 Mobile went away, the live tile interface really didn't make much sense anymore. I'd rather Microsoft focus on a clean, easy to use and easy to understand Start menu experience for Windows going forward.
Last edited by a moderator: